The independent Oversight Board has told Meta (formerly Facebook) to create a communications channel for victims of ‘doxing’, give users more control over how they consent to sharing their private residential information and provide data showing the amount of content removed following privacy-related government requests.

In ‘doxing,’ previously private information is made public in order to shame or harm the victim.

The Oversight Board, constituted by with 20 members from across the world, issued its first policy opinion late on Tuesday, asking and to improve their policies to protect users against doxing.

Last year, Meta requested a policy advisory opinion from the Board on the sharing of private residential addresses and images, and the contexts in which this information may be published on and

Meta noted that doxing can have negative real-world consequences, such as harassment or stalking.

“The Board understands that the sharing of private residential addresses and images represents a potentially serious violation of the right to privacy both for people who use Facebook and Instagram, and those who do not,” it said in a statement.

Once this information is shared, the harms that can result, such as doxing, are difficult to remedy.

“Harms resulting from doxing disproportionately affect groups such as women, children and LGBTQIA+ people, and can include emotional distress, loss of employment and even physical harm or death,” the Board stressed.

The Board believes that Meta’s Privacy Violations policy should be more protective of privacy.

“As such, the Board favours narrowing the exceptions to the Privacy Violations policy to help Meta better protect the private residential information of people both on and off its platforms”.

In its policy advisory opinion, the Board made 17 recommendations covering content policy, enforcement, and transparency.

“Create a specific communications channel for victims of doxing, available to both people who use its platforms and those who do not. This should be easily accessed, allow the victim to explain in detail their situation and risks the content creates for them, and prompt swift action from the company,” the Board elaborated.

Meta should prioritise action when the impacted person says they belong to a group facing heightened risk to their safety in the region where the private residence is located, it added.



(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.